Teaching American History Grant Lesson Plan Rubric HTML Template
|
Beginning |
Progressing |
Proficient |
Advanced |
Comments |
Rationale |
No rationale was given for why this lesson should be taught.
|
A rationale was given for why this lesson should be taught but it was not aligned to district, state and national standards. |
A rationale was given for why this lesson should be taught and how it was aligned to district, state and national standards. |
A rationale was given for why this lesson should be taught, how the lesson was relevant to students’ lives and how it was aligned to district, state and national standards. |
|
Guided Question |
The lesson was not related to the guided question. |
The lesson is aligned to the guided question. |
The lesson is aligned to the guided question and adds information that may or may not be significant... |
The lesson is aligned to the guided question and adds significant information. |
|
Standards/ |
Standards/objectives were not stated. |
Standards/objectives were not clearly stated and/or expected only knowledge or comprehension of the concepts learned. |
Standards/objectives were clearly stated and expected application of the concepts learned |
Standards/objectives were clearly stated, relevant to the lesson, and expected analysis, synthesis and evaluation of the concepts learned. |
|
Anticipatory Set |
Anticipatory set was not a part of the lesson plan. |
Anticipatory set was a part of the lesson plan. |
An anticipatory set that would activate prior knowledge was a part of the lesson plan. |
An anticipatory set that would be relevant and engaging to students, activate prior knowledge and would create interest in the topic was a part of the lesson plan. |
|
|
Beginning |
Progressing |
Proficient |
Advanced |
Comments |
Directions/ |
Directions/procedures for instruction were not in the lesson plan. |
Directions/procedures for instruction were stated in the lesson plan. |
Directions/procedures for instruction were clearly stated in the lesson plan. |
Directions/procedures for instruction were logical, and clearly stated in the lesson plan. |
|
Instructional Strategies |
No instructional strategies were planned for the lesson. |
One or two instructional strategies were planned for the lesson, but strategies were not aligned to the standard/ objective. |
Different instructional strategies were planned for the lesson, every 15 to 20 minutes and these strategies were aligned to the standard/ objective. |
Different instructional strategies that engaged students were planned for the lesson, and these strategies were aligned to the standard/ |
|
Use of Primary Resources |
The lesson plan did not provide for using primary resources. |
The lesson plan provided for using primary resources. |
The lesson plan provided for student engagement and analysis when using primary resources. |
The lesson plan provided for student engagement at higher cognitive levels when using primary resources. |
|
Planned use of technology with students |
No integration of technology was planned for students in the lesson or unit. |
The integration of technology was planned for students in the lesson or unit, but it was inappropriate. |
The integration of appropriate technology was planned for students in the lesson or unit. |
The integration of appropriate technology was consistently planned for students at higher cognitive levels in the lesson or unit. |
|
Assessment |
There were no assessments planned for in the lesson. |
Assessments planned for the lesson were irrelevant or misaligned. |
Relevant and rigorous assessments were planned for the lesson. |
Both formal and informal relevant and rigorous assessments were planned for the lesson. |
|
|
Beginning |
Progressing |
Proficient |
Advanced |
Comments |
Closure of the Lesson |
The teacher planned to end the lesson by dismissing the class. |
The teacher planned to summarize what had been learned in the lesson. |
The teacher planned to have students summarize what had been learned in the lesson. |
The teacher planned to have students summarize what had been learned in the lesson and to relate it to previous knowledge. |
|
Bibliography and Resources |
The listing of materials and resources for use with the lesson or unit was incomplete. |
The listing of materials and resources for use with the lesson or unit was complete. |
The listing of materials and resources for use with the lesson was complete and included primary resources. |
The listing of materials and resources for use with the lesson was complete and included the source of both primary and secondary resources. |
|
Examples of Student work |
There were no examples of student work included with the lesson plan. |
There were student examples included with the lesson plan, but they were not rigorous or aligned with the standards/objectives. |
Most examples of student work included with the lesson plan were rigorous and aligned with the standards/objectives. |
All examples of student work included with the lesson plan were rigorous and aligned with the standards/objectives. |
|
Differentiation of |
There are no planned activities to differentiate for diverse learners through content or instructional strategies in the lesson plan |
There is at least one planned activity to differentiate for diverse learners through content or instructional strategies in the lesson plan. |
There are at least two activities that differentiate for diverse learners through content or instructional strategies in the lesson plan. |
There are a variety of activities that differentiate for diverse learners through content or instructional strategies in the lesson plan |
|
*Interactive Slides, Social Studies Skill Builders, Experiential Exercise, Writing for Understanding, Response Groups, Problem Solving Group Work, Interactive Student Notebooks, and Culminating Projects.